tuff guy video of Reuben
Hope you like it! If it’s choppy Evgenya also uploaded it here.
-aaron
tuff guy
May 1, 2007girls’ names and math scores
April 30, 2007A recent study concludes that giving a girl a feminine name (eg. Elizabeth) makes her less likely to do well at math and science. The idea is that other people’s expectations of her will be influenced by the name, and they will in turn influence the girl. Makes sense.
Perhaps someday I will have a daughter. School will be fun for her. “Class, this is the new student, Smarty Handsoff.”
- aaron
Does good design really matter?
April 27, 2007Because it’s so hard to measure the business value of good design, it naturally gets less attention from managers. It’s easier to watch things like visitors to a website, sales per day, rent and other costs.
Recently we got a chance to see how much it matters when we rolled out a redesign for our Freedback service. Here are some of the changes we made:
- Reduced the number of steps required to create a form from four to three.
- Removed list of forms on the left to reduce visual clutter.
- Added breadcrumb navigation so it’s easier to see where you are.
- Users now create forms first, then decide what happens when they’re submitted.
(Hold your mouse over the image to toggle
between the new and old versions)
Digg users:
It’s possible this mouse-over won’t work for the cache you’re seeing.
Click here to load the original page.
Results
To be honest, when we rolled out the new software we hoped to get lots of emails thanking us for the new interface. Didn’t happen. We did get a few phone calls, mostly from people reporting bugs, and by the way did we change something?
After squashing a few bugs all was well with the world. We never did get much customer reaction, so we watched our graphs to see if we could see any change in how people used the software.
Number of forms created
Revenues
Thoughts and Conclusions
- When things are easy to use, people use them more.
- We didn’t see a dramatic increase in revenue from new users who had never seen the older version, but older accounts coming up for renewal were more likely to upgrade. This agrees with previous experience from other system upgrades; existing users like to see software improving.
- Hopefully this will translate into more links, reviews and word of mouth traffic, but that’s harder to correlate to this change because it takes time.
Update:
My wife knows much more than I do about graphing data (she’s an astronomer), and was nice enough to plot a graph using the raw data that better showed the results we were seeing.
This graph is showing daily Freedback revenue before and after the change (note the y-axis doesn’t start at zero).
- The green dots are days.
- The black line is a four-week moving average.
- The 13% represents the difference between one month before and after the change. It held true for six weeks before and after as well.
- Our weekly revenue cycle (lowest on weekends) results in a lot of scatter.
I hope this data is useful to other entrepreneurs wondering if they should invest in design, questions or comments welcome. I’ll keep posting graphs and results from tests we’re running – if you’re interested you can subscribe to our feed.
Programmed to be Happy – what a relief!
April 12, 2007This is officially my first blog post… My involvement in the blogosphere has long been encouraged by Aaron but I’ve never felt like I had the time or the interest in connecting with people through the internet. That’s why I pay a bunch of money for unlimited long-distance. And, certainly parenthood isn’t making MORE free time for me to blog. So, why now? Well, it is precisely because of the fact that I’ve become so busy, that I’ve needed to find new ways to connect. And all this busy-ness is due to some fascinating life changes and experiences that make me even more interested in communicating with people about these topics, especially with those are in similar roles. And for me, these roles include women in science, budding astronomers, educators, working mothers, guilty mothers (or are those two the same?), first-time mothers, wives of husbands of first-time mothers, etc. Plus, I have posts swirling around in my head about a few less-important of my societal roles such as jaywalker, tax-payer, patient of the American health-care system, Canadian living in the USA, frequent flyer, resenter of the ’self-help’ industry, lover of Netflix & Craigslist, hedonist, and so on…
I envision my blog posts to be places to discuss these topics with my friends (and anyone else who wants to visit) when we can’t make that Sunday afternoon phone-date like the good old days.
(Please ignore the poor spelling and grammar as i’m just going to freely type. Plus, aaron edits enough of my writing already so I won’t bother him with this.)
So, let’s get started… (and I promise the posts won’t all be about motherhood.)
Aaron and I watched a seminar online last night entitled “The (Misguided) Pursuit of Happiness” by Dan Gilbert which can be found here . It’s 21 minutes long and is entertaining and worth watching, though the point is made early on: Synthetic Happiness vs Natural Happiness, is one more valuable than the other? No!
There are wide-spread implications for what Dr. Gilbert is saying here but I’m particularly interested in reviewing this concept in the context of motherhood, and even further focusing on motherhood when working outside the home and when working inside the home. Which makes us happier? [Now a selfless mother might say it’s not about our happiness but about what is best for the children. Perhaps. But as Aaron likes to say, “When Mama ain’t happy, ain’t nobody happy!”]
According to Gilbert, the two options will make us equally happy because within a relatively short period of time, we will just simply be happy with whichever decision we made. Why? Because we are programmed to make lemonade from lemons while convincing ourselves that we were destined to drink this lemonade, and that we’ve never really wanted the ice tea in the first place. And furthermore, those that choose the ice tea don’t know what they’re missing!
Of my female friends with babies, most of those in Canada have chosen to take their full 1-year maternity leave, and then return to work. A few have decided to stay home full time, and some have even started kick-ass businesses while being at home (e.g. Alison’s sexy nursing bras – www.nummies.ca ). For those of us in the U.S. where the term “maternity leave” has yet to evolve from a 6-week, unpaid recovery, we’re all back at work pretty fast leaving our babies with sitters and pumping breast milk at every opportunity.
So, after seeing this seminar on Happiness and trying to objectively assess your choices, would you consider your current state as natural or synthesized happiness? Are you truly happy with your decision to work at home or at the office?
[It’s likely that all the new-mother hormones will skew the results, but it’s still worth thinking about. If you have a comment, please include it by clicking on the comment link below.]
- Evgenya
happiness
April 10, 2007micro-lending: buying cows and changing lives
April 5, 2007On the way to the coffee shop today, instead of listening to a podcast I turned on the radio and heard an interview with the founder of Kiva.org They’re one of several micro-lending organizations making it easy to lend money to entrepreneurs in developing nations.
Instead of being a gift, loans are paid back with 0% interest, and the money can then be withdrawn or given to someone else. The premise being that helping people to become self-sufficient is better than simply giving charity.
It’s working. The Grameen bank pioneered the model in 1976 and has loaned out over six billion dollars so far. Interestingly, their loans go mostly to women, who proved much more likely to pay back the loan and to spend the new income on their families.
Kiva.org brings the internet into the equation, allowing lenders (you! me!) to participate with amounts as small as $25. Larger loan requests are spread across many people, minimizing everyone’s risk. For example, while I’m happy to help Juma Rahimov towards the purchase of two cows, lending him the entire $800 he needs would require more serious research.
I’d want to meet him, but he’s in Tajikistan. I’d want to talk to him, but he probably doesn’t English… Luckily for me, 96% of loans are repaid in full, and since I’m only lending $25 if Juma can’t pay me back I’ll be alright.
I found myself most interested in loans that might get people over a specific problem that’s holding back their business. For example, Cecilia Tettey in Ghana buys corn from farmers and sells it to retailers in the city. She needs better transportation, which could really big boost for her business if it meant more trips to the city or less time spent on the road.
It’s interesting to try thinking like an investor. Along with the text, you find yourself studying the pictures for clues. Would this person pay back the loan? Do they look honest? A hard worker?
In the end we can’t help but be influenced by the images. Somehow the man above reminds me of my father-in-law. And my friend Ross who always stops to help people with car trouble. Heck, even the fact that he’s working in the cold makes me want to help him.
Traditional economic theory is all about rational decisions. Spreadsheets and calculators. Lending like this is interesting because it can’t be done rationally. You just don’t get enough information. A picture, a paragraph or two and your gut. That’s it.
Somehow the lack of perfect information makes it fun. With more information I might find myself trying to calculate return on investment. Instead I find myself thinking “holy smokes lady! That corn looks heavy. Maybe this loan will help you buy a truck.”
What do you think, is this the future of giving? Would it change the equation if the rate of return wasn’t 0%?
reuben at six months
April 2, 2007reuben at six months young.
reuben@6months video clip
If the video’s choppy it’s also here
hmm, been awhile
April 1, 2007Time to start posting again. It won’t always be about hawaii, but we’ll try to post more often. :)
To start things off… this is pretty neat.
conferences and confidence
March 28, 2007We just got back from the <a href=”http://www.sxsw.com/interactive”SXSW interactive conference in Austin, Texas.
Because we work remotely many of us had never actually met each other, let alone shared a time zone. Being in one place meant we could match faces to voices and raise a glass. It was great. Handshakes when we got there and hugs when we left.
The sessions themselves were good but the highlight is always the hallway. Meeting people in person, looking them in the eye and shaking their hand.
Connecting.
Over the last few years I’ve met a few of my heroes there, the people behind some of the products or blogs I love. It’s one of the reasons I go to conferences.
While you shake their hand and tell the OMG! in your head to shut up, a part of you realizes they’re not actually 7 feet tall and made of bronze. And as you realize they’re not so different and they gingerly step off the pedestal in your mind, something shifts in your self-confidence.
That confidence shift is a big deal for entrepreneurs, because the limiter on what you can accomplish is what you believe you can accomplish. You are your limit.
Whether or not you believe you can do something is based on your past experiences and external examples from people you know. “Have I ever done anything like this?” … “do I know anyone who’s done anything like this?” The more similar you are to someone else, the more your brain uses their results as a proxy for your own. In other words, “if they can do it, I can too!”
In 1953 Roger Bannister ran a mile in under four minutes, something few people thought possible. The world record had stood for nine years, but once he showed it could be done just 46 days later John Landy did it too and five others quickly followed. Bannister was an inspiration to other runners because they were similar to him. His example was relevant.
It doesn’t make me think I could do it, because I’m not like him. Also because running fast when you don’t have to is for crazy people.
Aaron, Roben, Barb, Ned.
Thanks for making it a great conference, it was great meeting up with you… Grant Storry who’s making RSS feeds do cartwheels, Scott McDaniel and Christian Vanek from Survey Gizmo, Derek Scruggs from Enthusiast Group, Henry Copeland from blogads, John Unger from Typepad Hacks, Christine Liu who does amazing things with fashion and technology, Kelley Poturalski from puppet show new media, Samantha Warren from bad ass ideas, Dan Drinkard from display awesome and David Cohen, who created the TechStars project in Boulder.
See you next year!
on finding a designer
March 1, 2007We recently posted a job looking for a designer for our startup.
We wanted a design geek who could banter usability theory on the phone, then hang up and make magic happen in the code. Not an easy person to find, and ultimately we posted this job twice to find the right person.[1]
We received over 250 applications, and going through them was an adventure. As they came in I checked their portfolios and sorted applications into “oooh”, “maybe” and “no”. This worked well enough, and I could move applications from one category to another as the process went along.[2]
Along with all the generic “I want a job” applications destined for the trash, we heard from a diverse crowd. One email might be from someone in New York requiring $120/hour, and the next from a small team in Poland competing on price at $7/hour.
We heard from print designers, web designers, illustrators, several programmers and a project manager at Microsoft. Twelve people ended up with a the label “interesting”; not right for the job but I’d love to have a beer with them someday.
In the end, Roben Kleene impressed the heck out of us and is already doing great work. Welcome aboard sir!
Hopefully this review will help other small startups when hiring a designer. Happy to answer questions in the comments.
Results by site
| Cost | “Oooh” | $/”Oooh” | Notes | Rating* | |
|
$185 | 1 | $185 | Not sure why we didn’t get more applications here. I think they’re quite popular in the UK, perhaps time zones got in the way. |  |
|
$200 | 1 | $200 | I had some initial trouble posting the job (my fault), but Michael Arrington took care of it right away.* |  |
 (Authentic Jobs) |
$250 | 2 | $125 |  Designer found here! |
 |
|
$250 +$300 |
5 | $110 | Great quality, very targeted. |  |
 (Craigslist) |
$100 | 2 | $50 | Posted in Vancouver, Toronto, Los Angeles ($25), San Francisco ($75), Boulder, Austin & Seattle. Craigslist reaches a lot of people, but the average application isn’t very good. |  |
|
$52 | 1 | $52 | Many applications, slightly more qualified than Craigslist. |  |
 (Joel on Software) |
$350 | - | - | The designer jobs section is tiny but I tried it anyway because of their guarantee. Indeed the response was small, and I got a prompt refund with a smile. Impressive.* |  |
|
free | - | - | Posting process was frustrating. |  |
 (Programmer meet Designer) |
free | - | - | Neat concept and targetted to designers. Medium volume. | |
| Totals | $1,312 | 12 | $109.33 | - | - |
*Ratings are based on both the quantity and percentage of high-quality, targeted applications received. Some of my favourite sites didn’t rate highly, simply because they’re not targeting the design crowd. I expect the ratings would be quite different if we were posting a programming or marketing gig.
[1] In theory, if you can’t find the perfect person you should walk away. Hire no-one.
In the real world that’s not how it works. Even if there are no candidates that make your heart race, you will hire someone. The solution is to manage the process with this reality in mind, and attract as many qualified applications as you can.
Volume is the answer.
[2] Next time I’ll use a separate email account to receive applications. That way they’re not mixed in with all my other email, and it enables sharing when appropriate with relevant team members.
